1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Jaguar | Ford |
Model | XK | E-350 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 57 L |