1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (201 HP) has 43 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 280 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Jaguar | Kia |
Model | XK | Cadenza |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 201 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2845 mm |