1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2011 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2011 Dodge Ram is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Dodge Ram. (235 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2011 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Jaguar | Dodge |
Model | XK | Ram |
Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 88.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 100 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 98 L |