1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2011 Ford F-450
To start off, 2011 Ford F-450 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 6,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-450 (399 HP @ 2800 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Because 2011 Ford F-450 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-450 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-450 (1,085 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 795 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jaguar XK. (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Ford F-450 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2011 Ford F-450 | |
Make | Jaguar | Ford |
Model | XK | F-450 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 6700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 399 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 1085 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 6680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2438 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 2024 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 4379 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 142 L |