1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (165 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (230 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Jaguar XK | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
| Make | Jaguar | Chevrolet |
| Model | XK | Captiva |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2384 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 165 HP |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4673 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1849 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1756 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2707 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 65 L |
