1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford E-Series is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
Make | Jaguar | Ford |
Model | XK | E-Series |
Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 252 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 25 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 2111 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3505 mm |