1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar XK weights approximately 40 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (279 Nm @ 5100 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Jaguar | Mini |
Model | XK | Roadster |
Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 279 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3758 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1391 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 50 L |