1952 Jeep CJ3A vs. 1962 Morgan 4
To start off, 1962 Morgan 4 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jeep CJ3A (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1962 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jeep CJ3A should accelerate faster than 1962 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 450 kg more than 1962 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Morgan 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Jeep CJ3A | 1962 Morgan 4 | |
| Make | Jeep | Morgan |
| Model | CJ3A | 4 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1340 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 55 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2450 mm |
