1952 Jeep CJ3A vs. 1973 Peugeot 304
To start off, 1973 Peugeot 304 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Peugeot 304 (64 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Peugeot 304 should accelerate faster than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 195 kg more than 1973 Peugeot 304.
Because 1952 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Peugeot 304. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Peugeot 304. (94 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1952 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Peugeot 304.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jeep CJ3A | 1973 Peugeot 304 | |
Make | Jeep | Peugeot |
Model | CJ3A | 304 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2600 mm |