1952 Jeep CJ3A vs. 1988 Mazda 323
To start off, 1988 Mazda 323 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Mazda 323 (66 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 240 kg more than 1988 Mazda 323.
Because 1952 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1988 Mazda 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Mazda 323. (101 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1952 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jeep CJ3A | 1988 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ3A | 323 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1480 mm |