1952 Jeep CJ3A vs. 1996 Lada 110
To start off, 1996 Lada 110 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lada 110 (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lada 110 should accelerate faster than 1952 Jeep CJ3A.
Because 1952 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Lada 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lada 110. (128 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1952 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lada 110.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jeep CJ3A | 1996 Lada 110 | |
Make | Jeep | Lada |
Model | CJ3A | 110 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2500 mm |