1952 Jeep CJ3A vs. 1996 Mazda 121
To start off, 1996 Mazda 121 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 119 kg more than 1996 Mazda 121.
Because 1952 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda 121. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 121. (103 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1952 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 121.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jeep CJ3A | 1996 Mazda 121 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ3A | 121 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 991 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2460 mm |