1952 Jeep CJ3A vs. 1998 Lotus 340 R
To start off, 1998 Lotus 340 R is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus 340 R (190 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus 340 R should accelerate faster than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 435 kg more than 1998 Lotus 340 R.
Because 1952 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Lotus 340 R. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lotus 340 R (198 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm). This means 1998 Lotus 340 R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jeep CJ3A | 1998 Lotus 340 R | |
Make | Jeep | Lotus |
Model | CJ3A | 340 R |
Year Released | 1952 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 198 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1130 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2320 mm |