1952 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2005 Proton Tiara
To start off, 2005 Proton Tiara is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 330 kg more than 2005 Proton Tiara.
Because 1952 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Proton Tiara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Proton Tiara. (90 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1952 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Proton Tiara.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jeep CJ3A | 2005 Proton Tiara | |
Make | Jeep | Proton |
Model | CJ3A | Tiara |
Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 90 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2290 mm |