1952 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2006 Mazda 5
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 5 (157 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1952 Jeep CJ3A.
Because 1952 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda 5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 5 (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jeep CJ3A | 2006 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ3A | 5 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 201 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2760 mm |