1952 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2010 Honda Jazz
To start off, 2010 Honda Jazz is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Jazz (77 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Jazz should accelerate faster than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 62 kg more than 2010 Honda Jazz.
Because 1952 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Honda Jazz. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda Jazz. (110 Nm). This means 1952 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda Jazz.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Jeep CJ3A | 2010 Honda Jazz | |
| Make | Jeep | Honda |
| Model | CJ3A | Jazz |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1245 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 77 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 110 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1048 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 3840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2460 mm |
