1952 Maserati A6G vs. 1984 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1984 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,954 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Maserati A6G (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. (70 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Maserati A6G weights approximately 180 kg more than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Maserati A6G | 1984 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Maserati | Mitsubishi |
| Model | A6G | Colt |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1954 cc | 1437 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 920 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2390 mm |
