1952 Maserati A6G vs. 1996 Mazda 626
To start off, 1996 Mazda 626 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,954 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda 626 (104 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1952 Maserati A6G. (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1952 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda 626 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1952 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Maserati A6G | 1996 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Maserati | Mazda |
| Model | A6G | 626 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1954 cc | 1840 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1140 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2620 mm |
