1952 Maserati A6G vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,954 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Maserati A6G (101 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Maserati A6G weights approximately 450 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Maserati A6G | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Maserati | MCC |
| Model | A6G | Smart |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1954 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 650 kg |
