1952 Maserati A6G vs. 2004 BMW 318
To start off, 2004 BMW 318 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 BMW 318 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Maserati A6G (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2004 BMW 318. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 318. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 318 weights approximately 830 kg more than 1952 Maserati A6G.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 BMW 318 has automatic transmission and 1952 Maserati A6G has manual transmission. 1952 Maserati A6G will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 BMW 318 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Maserati A6G | 2004 BMW 318 | |
| Make | Maserati | BMW |
| Model | A6G | 318 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1987 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 550 kg | 1380 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2770 mm |
