1952 Maserati A6G vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,964 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1952 Maserati A6G. (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1952 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 413 kg more than 1952 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Maserati A6G | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Maserati | Mazda |
Model | A6G | 6 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1954 cc | 2964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1513 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2680 mm |