1952 Maserati A6G vs. 2005 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2005 Toyota Celica is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,987 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Celica (180 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1952 Maserati A6G. (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1952 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Celica weights approximately 584 kg more than 1952 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Maserati A6G | 2005 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Maserati | Toyota |
| Model | A6G | Celica |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1987 cc | 1803 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 550 kg | 1134 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2910 mm |
