1952 Maserati A6G vs. 2008 Mazda 3
To start off, 2008 Mazda 3 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Maserati A6G (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 3. (148 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 3 weights approximately 675 kg more than 1952 Maserati A6G.
Because 1952 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Maserati A6G | 2008 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Maserati | Mazda |
| Model | A6G | 3 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1987 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 550 kg | 1225 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2650 mm |
