1952 Maserati A6G vs. 2009 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2009 Mazda Tribute is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,483 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda Tribute (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1952 Maserati A6G. (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1952 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 450 kg more than 1952 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda Tribute, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Maserati A6G | 2009 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Maserati | Mazda |
Model | A6G | Tribute |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1954 cc | 2483 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1550 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2630 mm |