1952 Maserati A6G vs. 2010 Holden Captiva
To start off, 2010 Holden Captiva is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Captiva (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1952 Maserati A6G. (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Captiva should accelerate faster than 1952 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Holden Captiva weights approximately 755 kg more than 1952 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Holden Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Maserati A6G. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Maserati A6G | 2010 Holden Captiva | |
Make | Maserati | Holden |
Model | A6G | Captiva |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1954 cc | 1990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1855 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2710 mm |