1952 Maserati A6G vs. 2012 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2012 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 SsangYong Rexton (161 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1952 Maserati A6G. (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1952 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 1422 kg more than 1952 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Maserati A6G. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Maserati A6G | 2012 SsangYong Rexton | |
| Make | Maserati | SsangYong |
| Model | A6G | Rexton |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1987 cc | 2696 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 550 kg | 1972 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2830 mm |
