1952 Maserati A6G vs. 2012 Volkswagen CC
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen CC is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volkswagen CC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volkswagen CC (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1952 Maserati A6G. (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen CC should accelerate faster than 1952 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volkswagen CC weights approximately 413 kg more than 1952 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen CC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Maserati A6G | 2012 Volkswagen CC | |
Make | Maserati | Volkswagen |
Model | A6G | CC |
Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1954 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1513 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2708 mm |