1952 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1952 Mercedes-Benz 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Mercedes-Benz 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2005 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Renault |
| Model | 300 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2995 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2570 mm |
