1952 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2010 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC90 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Mercedes-Benz 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2010 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
| Model | 300 | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2995 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 235 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4808 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1897 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1783 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2860 mm |
