1952 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2013 Dodge DURANGO
To start off, 2013 Dodge DURANGO is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge DURANGO is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2013 Dodge DURANGO | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Dodge |
| Model | 300 | DURANGO |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2995 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 286 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 5075 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2172 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1801 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 3042 mm |
