1952 Mercury Monterey vs. 2002 Suzuki Covie
To start off, 2002 Suzuki Covie is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Mercury Monterey. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Mercury Monterey would be higher. At 4,191 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Mercury Monterey is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Mercury Monterey weights approximately 930 kg more than 2002 Suzuki Covie.
Because 1952 Mercury Monterey is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Mercury Monterey. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Suzuki Covie, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Suzuki Covie has automatic transmission and 1952 Mercury Monterey has manual transmission. 1952 Mercury Monterey will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Suzuki Covie will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Mercury Monterey | 2002 Suzuki Covie | |
Make | Mercury | Suzuki |
Model | Monterey | Covie |
Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4191 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 2950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 1530 mm |