1952 Mercury Monterey vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Mercury Monterey. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Mercury Monterey would be higher. At 4,191 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Mercury Monterey is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 191 kg more than 1952 Mercury Monterey.
Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Mercury Monterey. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Mercury Monterey | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Mercury | Jaguar |
| Model | Monterey | XJ |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4191 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 335 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 1871 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 5127 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2105 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1456 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3032 mm |
