1952 MG YB vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 MG YB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 MG YB would be higher. At 1,461 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Clio (78 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1952 MG YB. (45 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1952 MG YB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 MG YB weights approximately 76 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio.
Because 1952 MG YB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 MG YB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Renault Clio (185 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 MG YB. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2002 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 MG YB.
Compare all specifications:
1952 MG YB | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | MG | Renault |
Model | YB | Clio |
Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 1250 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2480 mm |