1952 MG YB vs. 2013 Mazda 2
To start off, 2013 Mazda 2 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 MG YB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 MG YB would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 2 (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1952 MG YB. (45 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1952 MG YB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 MG YB weights approximately 17 kg more than 2013 Mazda 2.
Because 1952 MG YB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 MG YB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda 2 (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 MG YB. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 MG YB.
Compare all specifications:
1952 MG YB | 2013 Mazda 2 | |
Make | MG | Mazda |
Model | YB | 2 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 1250 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1043 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1476 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2489 mm |