1952 Morgan Plus 4 vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Morgan Plus 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Morgan Plus 4 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Renault Clio weights approximately 173 kg more than 1952 Morgan Plus 4.
Because 1952 Morgan Plus 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Morgan Plus 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Morgan Plus 4 | 2000 Renault Clio | |
Make | Morgan | Renault |
Model | Plus 4 | Clio |
Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2770 mm |