1952 Nissan Sedan vs. 2009 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Nissan Sedan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Nissan Sedan would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (83 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1952 Nissan Sedan. (18 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1952 Nissan Sedan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 315 kg more than 1952 Nissan Sedan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Nissan Sedan | 2009 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Nissan | Volkswagen |
| Model | Sedan | Polo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 860 cc | 1390 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1105 kg |
