1952 Nissan Sedan vs. 2013 Ford Transit Connect
To start off, 2013 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Nissan Sedan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Nissan Sedan would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford Transit Connect is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Transit Connect (134 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1952 Nissan Sedan. (18 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Transit Connect should accelerate faster than 1952 Nissan Sedan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Transit Connect weights approximately 799 kg more than 1952 Nissan Sedan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Nissan Sedan | 2013 Ford Transit Connect | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | Sedan | Transit Connect |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 860 cc | 2000 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1589 kg |
