1952 Packard Patrician vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Packard Patrician. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Packard Patrician would be higher. At 5,199 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Packard Patrician is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1952 Packard Patrician is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Packard Patrician. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Packard Patrician | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Packard | Kia |
Model | Patrician | Cadenza |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5199 cc | 2700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5580 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2845 mm |