1952 Peugeot 203 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1960 Toyota Master RR is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Peugeot 203. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Peugeot 203 would be higher. At 1,453 cc, 1960 Toyota Master RR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Peugeot 203 (44 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Peugeot 203 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 290 kg more than 1952 Peugeot 203.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Peugeot 203 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Peugeot | Toyota |
| Model | 203 | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1290 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 75 L |
