1952 Peugeot 203 vs. 1968 Renault 4
To start off, 1968 Renault 4 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Peugeot 203. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Peugeot 203 would be higher. At 1,290 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Peugeot 203 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Peugeot 203 (44 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1968 Renault 4. (33 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Peugeot 203 should accelerate faster than 1968 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Peugeot 203 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1968 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Peugeot 203 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Peugeot 203. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Peugeot 203 | 1968 Renault 4 | |
Make | Peugeot | Renault |
Model | 203 | 4 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1290 cc | 747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 33 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 38 L |