1952 Peugeot 203 vs. 1969 Skoda 110 L
To start off, 1969 Skoda 110 L is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Peugeot 203. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Peugeot 203 would be higher. At 1,290 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Peugeot 203 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Skoda 110 L (72 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1952 Peugeot 203. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Skoda 110 L should accelerate faster than 1952 Peugeot 203. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Peugeot 203 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1969 Skoda 110 L.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Skoda 110 L (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Peugeot 203. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1969 Skoda 110 L will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Peugeot 203.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Peugeot 203 | 1969 Skoda 110 L | |
Make | Peugeot | Skoda |
Model | 203 | 110 L |
Year Released | 1952 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1290 cc | 1107 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 72 HP |
Torque | 81 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 31 L |