1952 Peugeot 203 vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Peugeot 203. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Peugeot 203 would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 616 kg more than 1952 Peugeot 203.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Peugeot 203. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Peugeot 203 | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Peugeot | Toyota |
Model | 203 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1290 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3270 mm |