1952 Peugeot 203 vs. 2005 Zastava 103
To start off, 2005 Zastava 103 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Peugeot 203. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Peugeot 203 would be higher. At 1,290 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Peugeot 203 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Zastava 103 (59 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1952 Peugeot 203. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Zastava 103 should accelerate faster than 1952 Peugeot 203.
Because 1952 Peugeot 203 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Peugeot 203. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Zastava 103, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Zastava 103 (88 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Peugeot 203. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Zastava 103 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Peugeot 203.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Peugeot 203 | 2005 Zastava 103 | |
| Make | Peugeot | Zastava |
| Model | 203 | 103 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 1290 cc | 1242 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 88 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2510 mm |
