1952 Peugeot 203 vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Peugeot 203. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Peugeot 203 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1952 Peugeot 203 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Peugeot 203. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Peugeot 203 | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Peugeot | Ford |
Model | 203 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1290 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2490 mm |