1952 Peugeot 203 vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Ford Ecosport is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Peugeot 203. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Peugeot 203 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 99 more horse power than 1952 Peugeot 203. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1952 Peugeot 203.
Because 2008 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Peugeot 203. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1952 Peugeot 203 has manual transmission. 1952 Peugeot 203 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Peugeot 203 | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Peugeot | Ford |
Model | 203 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1290 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2490 mm |