1952 Peugeot 203 vs. 2010 BMW 320
To start off, 2010 BMW 320 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Peugeot 203. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Peugeot 203 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 320 (182 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1952 Peugeot 203. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1952 Peugeot 203.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW 320 (380 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Peugeot 203. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Peugeot 203.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Peugeot 203 | 2010 BMW 320 | |
Make | Peugeot | BMW |
Model | 203 | 320 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1290 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 182 HP |
Torque | 81 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4624 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1384 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 57 L |