1952 Porsche 356 vs. 1960 Volvo 120
To start off, 1960 Volvo 120 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 1,582 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Volvo 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Volvo 120 weights approximately 180 kg more than 1952 Porsche 356.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Porsche 356 | 1960 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Porsche | Volvo |
| Model | 356 | 120 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1582 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 68 L |
