1952 Porsche 356 vs. 1962 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1962 Toyota Corona is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Porsche 356 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Porsche 356 (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1962 Toyota Corona. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Porsche 356 should accelerate faster than 1962 Toyota Corona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Toyota Corona weights approximately 125 kg more than 1952 Porsche 356.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Porsche 356 | 1962 Toyota Corona | |
| Make | Porsche | Toyota |
| Model | 356 | Corona |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 75 L |
