1952 Porsche 356 vs. 1964 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1964 Zastava 1500 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Porsche 356 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Porsche 356 (59 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Porsche 356 should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Zastava 1500 weights approximately 169 kg more than 1952 Porsche 356.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Porsche 356 | 1964 Zastava 1500 | |
| Make | Porsche | Zastava |
| Model | 356 | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 53 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 984 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2430 mm |
