1952 Porsche 356 vs. 1969 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1969 Triumph 2000 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1952 Porsche 356. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1952 Porsche 356. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 355 kg more than 1952 Porsche 356. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Porsche 356 | 1969 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Porsche | Triumph |
| Model | 356 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 64 L |
